Our schools – another way

Our schools are a microcosm of the role of competition in our society. They show how competition becomes increasingly institutionalised, normal and expected as we grow up. We turn from playful, inquisitive and creative toddlers into teenagers and adults who are compared and ranked against each other, measured against standardised benchmarks and conditioned to do “better” than others if we want to succeed.

Most people would probably agree that some change over the course of our childhood is justified or necessary. We try (and often fail) not to compare our babies and toddlers, accepting that every child develops at their own pace. At the same time, we accept that when we leave school, in most cases training and education institutions or workplaces will need to differentiate and select to some degree based on our school record.

But these assumptions do not begin to answer a whole range of questions. For example, what skills and aptitudes do individual employers need in today’s world? Are these the same as those our society will need to thrive into the future? How do we best capture and reflect this range of aptitudes and attidudes? How do we measure and recognise effort and motivation compared to talent? How do we best nurture all of these so everyone has the opportunity to discover and develop their aptitudes and interests and engage fully in society?

Continue reading

Brexit – the good, the bad and the no deal

Why a cooperative negotiation strategy might be more effective than a competitive one

Theresa May would prefer no deal to a “bad deal”, Jeremy Corbyn believes no deal is a bad deal.

Under the Tories, a post-Brexit future for UK without a deal with the EU is conceivable. A Conservative government would be happy to walk away from negotiations if their demands are not (or not sufficiently) met. Under Labour, we would expect the Government to do everything in its power to reach a deal with the EU.

On the face of it, these two approaches represent two classically opposing negotiation styles, on the one hand a competitive, or “positional” strategy, on the other a cooperative, or “interest-based” one. Continue reading

Life is a race – and we’re all losing

Life can feel like it’s a permanent race – at home, at work, in our society and across the globe. When Trump says  “America will start winning again”, he means others will lose. In the UK, we too are embarking on a new era of national self-interest. Decades of building international alliances, of striving to tackle global challenges together, are now unravelling as we enter the global race, even as it’s not clear what prize we’re striving for. Whatever we think we might win, it seems likely we’ll fail. In David Lammy’s words, on the post-EU world stage “other countries will hold a gun to our heads”.

Is life a zero-sum game? Do we need to do better than others to succeed, to be happy?

Continue reading